Amplitude vs Cursor

Head-to-head benchmark across 6 performance stats.

53
Amplitude
Amplitude
Analytics
◆
PWR
56
SPD
63
CLR
41
PRS
42
END
62
MMT
56

“User behavior decoded. Growth potential? Still loading.”

™ & © amplitude.com
023RARE · 1020
VSEVEN MATCH
63
Cursor
AI
PWR
79
SPD
64
CLR
75
PRS
64
END
58
MMT
36

“AI code completion that dominates the IDE while the hype train stalls.”

™ & © cursor.com
008EPIC · 1075

Amplitude leads on Momentum (+20), but Cursor edges out on Clarity (+34).

Side-by-Side
Amplitude
VS
Cursor
1020
Trophies
1075
#34
Global rank
#8
◆RARE
Rarity
EPIC
Analytics
Category
AI
22–18
Win / loss
26–17
3
Streak
1
Stat Comparison
56
POWERΔ 23
79
POWER: Amplitude 56, Cursor 79. Cursor leads by 23.

Cursor's domain authority is in another league here.↲

63
SPEEDΔ 1
64
SPEED: Amplitude 63, Cursor 64. Cursor leads by 1.

Cursor is marginally faster.↲

Cursor ranks 3rd of 14 in ai for Speed.

41
CLARITYΔ 34
75
CLARITY: Amplitude 41, Cursor 75. Cursor leads by 34.

Cursor's copy is dramatically clearer; visitors instantly get it.↲

Cursor ranks 2nd of 14 in ai for Clarity.

42
PRESENCEΔ 22
64
PRESENCE: Amplitude 42, Cursor 64. Cursor leads by 22.

Cursor dwarfs the other on visibility — a different scale entirely.↲

Cursor ranks 1st of 14 in ai for Presence.

62
ENDURANCEΔ 4
58
ENDURANCE: Amplitude 62, Cursor 58. Amplitude leads by 4.

↳Amplitude runs slightly more reliably.

Amplitude ranks 2nd of 7 in analytics for Endurance.

56
MOMENTUMΔ 20
36
MOMENTUM: Amplitude 56, Cursor 36. Amplitude leads by 20.

↳Amplitude is on a tear — momentum gap is decisive.

Amplitude ranks 2nd of 7 in analytics for Momentum.

Matchup Tier
DOMINANT
Cursor leads on most battle types

How this matchup looks across the full battle-type rotation, based on each side's stats. Real battles still depend on live events. This is just the underlying strength.

Head-to-Head Record
CursorLEADS 1–0· 1 battle
View Amplitude's cardView Cursor's card
Related Comparisons